|
|
Comparing Unrelated Donor to Sibling Donor TransplantConsideration of an unrelated donor or cord blood transplant is appropriate for any patient who is in need of an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant but has no matching sibling or other related donor available. Unrelated donor transplant outcomes have improved in the last decade and some studies have shown similar outcomes for unrelated donor and sibling donor transplantation in several diseases. Some of these studies are discussed below. For a discussion of key factors in improved unrelated donor outcomes, see Improvements in Unrelated Donor Transplantation. On this page:Acute leukemias — AdultThe acute leukemias -- acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) -- are the top two leading indications for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in adults. For details, see Outcomes and Trends and Trends in Allogeneic Transplants.For adults with acute leukemias, several recent smaller studies have demonstrated similar survival in transplants using related or unrelated donors. A 2007 study of 64 acute leukemia patients in first or second remission undergoing myeloablative transplant with busulfan, fludarabine and 400 cGy total-body irradiation found no significant difference in two-year disease-free survival (DFS) between related donor and unrelated donor transplantation (77% vs. 71%, respectively). [1] In a 2007 study of 105 patients aged 16-59 years with AML, no significant difference was found in five-year DFS between related and unrelated donor transplantation in good-risk patients (40% vs. 62%, respectively; p=0.2). Similarly, no significant difference in five-year DFS was found between related and unrelated donor recipients with poor-risk prognostic factors (25% vs. 21%, respectively; p=0.2). [2] A study of reduced-intensity transplantation in elderly patients (median age 60 years; range 44-70) with secondary AML or myelodysplastic syndrome has also produced similar outcomes between related and unrelated donors. All patients were in high-risk categories (high comorbidities or relapse after prior autologous transplantation) and therefore ineligible for standard myeloablative preparative regimens. Two-year overall survival in these patients did not differ between related and unrelated donors (25% vs. 39%, respectively; p=ns). [3] A study of 264 adult patients who received a myeloablative allogeneic transplant for ALL at nine centers, 1990-2002, showed that for transplants performed in 1st complete remission, 5-year disease-free survival was similar for unrelated (45%) and related donor (42%) transplants. Transplant-related mortality was also similar. [4] In a study of 127 adult patients with poor-risk ALL who had unrelated donor transplants, 1988-1999, Cornelissen et al found overall survival at 2 years was 40% and DFS was 37% for transplants performed during CR1. [5] The authors indicate these results compare favorably to results obtained with chemotherapy alone and match results for HLA-identical sibling donor transplants. A review of 46 patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL transplanted in the Nagoya Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group between 1981 and 2000 found that while donor type had a significant effect on treatment-related mortality, it was not statistically significant for DFS. [6] Acute leukemias — PediatricUnrelated donor transplants for pediatric patients with ALL can achieve at least equal survival to transplants using matched sibling donors. [7,8] In a study of 65 pediatric patients transplanted in 2nd remission at 7 centers, 5-year event-free survival was 39% for sibling donor transplants and 54% for unrelated donor transplants. [7]A 2006 study of 267 children with acute leukemias (ALL or acute myelogenous leukemia) found no differences in long-term overall survival and DFS in children receiving related donor grafts as compared to children receiving unrelated donor grafts. Three-year disease-free survival in patients transplanted in first complete remission (CR) was 49% (sibling) and 54% (unrelated donor). Overall survival and DFS were significantly higher in children transplanted in first CR compared with those transplanted in second remission or relapse. [9] Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)In patients with less advanced MDS (<5% blasts in the marrow), 3-year survival rates of 70% for HLA-identical related donor and 65% for unrelated donor transplants can be achieved. [10] For patients with more advanced disease, survival is lower and the difference between related donor and unrelated donor transplant outcomes is larger: 40-45% for related and 25-30% for unrelated donor transplants.Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML)The two studies described here show that outcomes can be similar for transplants using unrelated donors and sibling donors and that earlier transplants result in better outcomes. These results must be weighed against the potential benefits of imatinib therapy — see the discussion in Transplant Outcomes by Disease and Disease Stage.In a study of 141 patients with CML in 1st chronic phase, Davies et al [11] found no significant difference in 5-year survival:
In a prospective comparison of 2464 unrelated donor transplants with 450 matched sibling donor transplants for CML, Weisdorf et al [12] found that unrelated donor transplantation for early chronic phase CML yields survival and disease-free survival (DFS) approaching that of matched sibling transplantation. For transplants performed during chronic phase within 1 year of diagnosis, 5-year DFS was similar or only slightly inferior:
Inherited immune diseasesA review of 94 children within inherited hematological diseases transplanted at Hospital Necker, Paris, engraftment, incidence of GVHD and survival were all similar for matched sibling donor transplants and unrelated donor transplants at 0-1 HLA class I mismatch, and for haploidentical related donor transplants with at least a 7 of 10 HLA match. [13]A comparison of matched sibling donor, other related donor and unrelated donor transplants for Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome (WAS) found that for patients younger than age 5, survival for unrelated donor transplants was similar to that for HLA-identical sibling transplants. Overall, the 5-year probability of survival was 87% for transplants using sibling donors, 71% with unrelated donors and 52% with other related donors. [14] A 2006 study of 23 pediatric patients with WAS had similar results, with overall survival of 71% and 78%, respectively, for transplants using related and unrelated donors (p=ns). [15] Severe combined immune deficiency (SCID) patients undergoing matched unrelated donor transplant have better survival than patients who receive mismatched related grafts, according to a 2006 study published in JAMA. This retrospective study analyzed the medical records of 94 infants with SCID who received marrow transplants between 1990-2004 at two pediatric referral centers. Two-year overall survival (OS) was best in patients receiving matched related transplants (92%). Two-year OS of matched unrelated transplant recipients was significantly higher than mismatched related transplant recipients (81% vs. 53%, respectively; p=0.03). [16] Severe thalassemiaAllogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is the only curative option for patients with beta-thalassemia major. [17] Related-donor transplantation has been used to treat thalassemia for decades, and is the preferred treatment in this pediatric population. In the last several years, there has been a steady increase in the use of unrelated donor transplantation for severe thalassemia, and the first results show no significant difference between related and unrelated donors.In a 2006 study of 49 pediatric thalassemia patients, two-year event-free survival for related and unrelated donors was 82% and 71%, respectively (p=ns). [18] A 2007 study of 20 thalassemia patients receiving a reduced toxicity conditioning regimen of fludarabine and busulfan found excellent survival in both groups at 39 months (100%). [17] Severe aplastic anemiaMatched related donor hematopoietic cell transplantation is the treatment of choice for pediatric patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA). A 2006 study of 36 pediatric SAA patients demonstrated no significant difference in four-year overall survival between related and unrelated donors (93% vs. 89%, respectively; p=ns). [19]References
|
|
||
| Page last updated: November 2007 |